Let’s start
off by saying there might be a chronology issue here. Chapter
11 references Jesus being anointed in Bethany as if it already
occurred. Chapter
12 mentions the anointing taking place after Jesus had raised Lazarus from
the dead. So, is there confusion here?
No, there is
the telling of the story of Jesus by John.
This is not a newspaper story that piecemeals information day by day, but
a complete account. I could look back at
my history, ok ancient history, and say that I attended and graduated Mangum
High School. I got a bloody nose playing
baseball on my birthday. The school sits
right across from where I preached a revival, which just happened to be on the
Gospel of John.
All the
statements are accurate but not referenced for chronology. I got a bloody nose in a pick-up game at
recess while I was in the second grade. I graduated when bell-bottom trousers were the
fad and The Streak by Ray Stevens was the number 1 song. I preached in the church across the street
from the school—a Cumberland Presbyterian Church—the same year we did Good News
2012 here, whatever year that was. There
were a few intervening decades.
Now back to
John’s gospel.
In telling
the story in hindsight, the chronology might not be as important as the
identification of the location and cast.
We see the same thing in the gospel accounts where Judas Iscariot is
labeled as the one who betrayed Jesus throughout the accounts. John notes that this would occur later, but
it defines him through gospel accounts.
The story
doesn’t get told until John has the whole story and then he adds references
that help the reader identify with what’s happening sometimes when and
sometimes where.
In land
navigation, there is a tool known as resection. This helps you locate where you are by taking
back azimuths from at least two known points and then drawing them on a
map. Where the lines intersect is where
you are.
Most people
will never use this and now with GPS, most people don’t’ know how to do this,
but when you spent a lot of time in the middle of nowhere’s located throughout
the world, it’s a good skill to carry around with you.
It’s also
what we see in this first part of John 12.
John is pinpointing location and characters, not exact chronology.
That
established, Jesus was at the home of his three friends, or at another location
in Bethany depending upon how you try to reconcile Mark’s and Matthew’s accounts. Jesus was the guest of honor. Ya think!
Son of God,
the Christ, Messiah, and yes, the very One who raised Lazarus from the dead was
the guest of honor. Of course, Jesus is
the guest of honor is a home where people know him to be the Lamb of God who
takes away the sin of the world.
Most of
Jerusalem and Israel were looking for a different sort of Messiah. Those gathered on this special evening knew
the Messiah that God had sent. Perhaps
the hosts knew better than his disciples.
Then Mary
took a pint of perfume called Nard and poured it on the feet of Jesus and wiped
his feet with her hair. I’m sure that
stopped the casual conversation at the dinner table.
A pint isn’t
a lot, unless it’s a pint of perfume. In
this case, it was expensive perfume. It’s
the kind that you just dab here and there, unless you are anointing the body of
Jesus.
And it was
Nard. OK, that doesn’t mean anything to
us today. Nard came from a flower in the
Valerian family. It was the roots, not
the flower that was ground and distilled and used for aromatic and health
purposes. So, Mary was into essential
oils and must have used her points to get some really expensive perfume.
Judas noted
that it was worth a year’s wages. He
seemed indignant that it was lavished upon Jesus. Do you know how much food we could have
given to the poor?
There is a
rabbit trail about Judas here and how he helped himself to the general fund
that we won’t venture down very far at this time, but in the example of things
not being necessarily chronological in the telling, ask why was he not relieved
of his duties as treasurer. It’s more
likely that this detail was added in the telling at some later point.
But Judas is
making a point of this nonetheless. It
was a valid statement. Many poor people
could have been fed.
Think to the
man born blind. Jesus used that exact
time and place to show God’s glory.
Think to
Lazarus in the tomb 4 days. Jesus could
have come earlier but he didn’t. He took
that exact time and place to show God’s glory.
Mary took
this exact time and place to anoint the body of Jesus for his burial.
But he
wasn’t dead yet!
Jump ahead a
few chapters. Nicodemus and Joseph of
Arimathea brought 75 pounds worth of cloth and spices to wrap the body of Jesus
before leaving him in the tomb. Why was
what Mary did necessary?
This
anointing prepared Jesus for burial. He
told his followers that the poor would always be among them but they wouldn’t
have him for much longer. His time had
come.
His time had
come.
Where were
the disciples when the body of Jesus was prepared and placed in the tomb? They were scattered and afraid, gathering
only in fear of being found. This was
the only time that the disciples would have to see their Master prepared for
burial. They would be hiding in fear in
only a few days.
Jesus told
his disciples to leave her alone. She is
doing the exact thing that has been appointed to her. There was timing with the woman at the well.
There was timing with the man blind since birth.
There was timing with Lazarus.
There was
timing in Mary pouring very expensive perfume on the feet of Jesus and wiping
it with her hair. Mary surely had the
best smelling hair in Bethany for all of Passover week.
What was the
timing? The time for the Unblemished
Lamb to be sacrificed for the sins of the world was at hand.
His time was
at hand. Here are a couple more things
from this pericope. Let’s deal with the
statement that you will always have the poor among you.
Is Jesus
directing that there will always be poor people? It this a predestined condition?
On the
contrary, God wanted no poor among these Chosen People. All they need do was abide in his law and
directives. The poor are one symptom of these people’s disobedience.
They tell us
that we still live in a broken world. We
are charged to help the least of these among us, but so long as the world lives by
sin, we will have no shortage of people who need help.
The next
item is about destroying evidence.
Lazarus was getting more than 15 minutes of fame. He was the star attraction in Bethany. Many had seen him in the tomb. Many had seen him resurrected by Jesus. Many more came to see him and subsequently
believed in Jesus because of this miracle.
If you walk
on water, there is no evidence. Nothing
got posted to Facebook or YouTube.
But when you raise a man from the dead, that evidence is before you
every day.
The man blind from birth that Jesus healed was also evidence,
but evidently it didn’t meet the threshold that required his death. The religious leaders would just try to
discredit this miracle, but a dead man who now lives was another story.
The
religious leaders had already decided to kill Jesus and were trying to figure
out how to do this and make it look legitimate.
Now they decided they needed to destroy the evidence of his most recent
miracle—Lazarus.
We don’t
know if this happened. Non-biblical
sources indicate that Lazarus and his sisters might have moved to Europe. But at this point in the gospel, Lazarus was
a liability to those who would kill Jesus.
The religious leaders needed to tie up some loose ends.
To wrap up:
Jesus has
been prepared for burial.
The poor are
an ongoing sign of the world’s brokenness.
The plot to
kill Jesus now included a plan to tie up a loose end named Lazarus.
There is
much more to come.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment